Trans Women Not Legally Women, Declares Uk Supreme Court: Find The Full Verdict Inside

UK Supreme Court’s Ruling On Definition Of Woman In Equality Act 2010

In a ruling that has stirred both celebration and concern across the UK, the Supreme Court has determined that the terms "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refer strictly to biological definitions. This landmark decision means that trans women,even those with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC),are not legally classified as women under this particular legislation. The judgment has profound implications for the future of gender recognition, legal protections, and access to single-sex spaces across the country.

The Case Behind The Verdict

The legal challenge was brought by gender-critical campaign group 'For Women Scotland',financially supported by author JKRowling. The group disputed Scottish legislation that allowed trans women with GRCs to occupy public board positions reserved for women. Two lower courts had previously ruled against their arguments. However, the UK’s highest court saw things differently.

Winners in the UK Supreme Court today:

Women and girls, including trans-identified women (continue to benefit from maternity rights etc)
Gay people
Freedom of speech
Freedom of association
Those at risk of discrimination for a belief in the material reality of sex.

1/2

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) April 16, 2025

Lord Hodge, Deputy President of the Supreme Court, delivered the judgment. He clarified that while the words "biological" do not explicitly appear in the Equality Act, the ordinary and widely understood meanings of “man” and “woman” inherently relate to biological sex. The court found that interpreting “sex” as inclusive of gender identity would distort the Act’s provisions and lead to legal inconsistency.

Implications for Single-Sex Spaces

The court highlighted that allowing trans women with GRCs the same rights as biological women could make it difficult for service providers,such as hospitals, hostels, and sports clubs,to uphold single-sex provisions. A key concern was the practical and legal ambiguity this created: providers might not know whether someone with a GRC is legally considered female, due to the confidentiality of such documentation.

By reaffirming that sex in law refers to biology, the ruling solidifies the right of institutions to restrict access to certain services based on biological sex, potentially excluding trans women from women-only spaces like changing rooms or refuges.

Scotland's First Minister, John Swinney, accepted the judgment but committed to examining its wider implications. The UK government, meanwhile, welcomed the ruling as bringing “clarity and confidence” for women and those operating single-sex services.

This verdict marks a critical juncture in Britain’s ongoing conversation about gender, rights, and legal identity. As the dust settles, one thing remains certain: the debate over the intersection of sex and gender in law is far from over.

If you liked this story, then please share it. To read more such stories, stay connected to HerZindagi.

Image Credits: Canva