• + Install App
  • हिन्दी
  • Search
  • Close
    Looking For Something?
    Search
author-profile

Daughters Entitled To Self-Acquired And Inherited Properties After Father’s Death Without A Will: SC

The SC has put an end to a long-running debate over a daughter's right to inherit her father's self-acquired property.
author-profile
Next
Article
dying father will to daughter

The Supreme Court of India has been loud and liberal (rightly) in interpreting the law of inheritance for Hindu Women in the recent past. On 20th January 2022, in the matter of Arunachala Gounder (Dead) Vs Ponnusamy (Civil Appeal No. 6659 Of 2011), the Supreme Court of India held that when a Hindu father dies without a will, his daughter is entitled to inherit his self-acquired property or that obtained through family inheritance.

Supreme Court Judgement

The Supreme Court of India held that “If a property of a male Hindu dying intestate (without a will) is a self-acquired property or obtained in the partition of a coparcenary or a family property, the same would devolve by inheritance and not by survivorship, and a daughter of such a male Hindu would be entitled to inherit such property in preference to other collaterals (such as sons/daughters of brothers of deceased father)."

Regarding the judgement, Swagita Pandey, Associate at Lexport says, "This landmark decision has put a halt on long lasting debate about the right of the daughter to inherit the self-acquired property of her father, in the absence of any other legal heir".

SWAGITA PANDEY ON SC VERDICT

The judgement came after it was dealing with a case in which a Hindu man with self-acquired property died and one of the five heirs filed a petition for property partition.

Daughter Will Inherit Self-Acquired Property

The judgement came on an appeal case against Madras High Court verdict which dealt with the property rights of Hindu women and widows under the Hindu Succession Act.

Furthermore, if a Hindu female dies without writing a will, the property she inherited from her father will pass to her father's heirs, but the property she inherited from her husband will pass to her husband's heirs.

Overall, the purpose is to ensure that the inherited property is returned to the source. The verdict stated, "The basic aim of the legislature in enacting Section 15(2) (of the Hindu Succession Act) is to ensure that inherited property of a female Hindu dying issueless and intestate, goes back to the source.”

Don't miss: Supreme Court Upholds 80-Year Old Woman's Conviction Over Cruelty Against Daughter-In-Law

The Case 

Marappa Gounder, a Hindu, died with self-acquired property. He had a younger brother, Ramasamy Gounder, who had already died, and a daughter, Kupayee Ammal.

After Kupayee Ammal died without a will, her property was divided among her uncle Ramasamy Gounder's five heirs in a 1/5th share each. One of the five heirs, Tangamma, filed a suit for property division. 

The court was examining whether the daughter had the right to inherit her father's self-acquired property in the absence of any other legal heirs. The court was dealing with whether the property would pass to the daughter by inheritance or to the man's brother by survivorship after the father died without a will.

According to Live Law, the court was also looking at the order of succession following the death of the daughter that happened after amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, came into force.

Don't miss: Supreme Courts Says Women Can Take NDA Exams, Reprimands Army For Gender Discrimination

The Judgement

In its verdict, the court held that upon the father’s death, such property would devolve by inheritance and not by survivorship.

“The main scheme of this Act is to establish complete equality between male and female with regard to property rights and the rights of the female were declared absolute, completely abolishing all notions of a limited estate,” the court said. “The Act brought about changes in the law of succession among Hindus and gave rights which were till then unknown in relation to women’s property.”

The court held that the 1956 Act shall apply in this case and so Ramasamy Gounder’s daughters, being Class-I heirs of their father, too shall be the heirs and entitled to the share in the suit properties.

For more such stories,stay tuned to HerZindagi!

Disclaimer

Your skin and body like you are unique. While we have taken all measures to ensure that the information provided in this article and on our social media channels is credible and expert verified, we recommend you consult a doctor or your dermatologist before trying a home remedy, quick hack or exercise regime. For any feedback or complaint, reach out to us at compliant_gro@jagrannewmedia.com